Promotional Videos

  • Sustainable

    The community has embraced the primary objective of sustainability through an understanding of what it means to live in harmony with nature and natural laws.

    Read More...
  • Lifestyle

    The community "lifestyle" means having an enthusiasm for life and the way in which people interact, support, and nurture themselves and each other in everything they do.

    Read More...
  • Food and Diet

    Project TriStar has determined that a raw vegan diet provides the greatest opportunity for achieving optimal health and long-term sustainability that is harmonic with the core beliefs of the community.

    Read More...
  • Membership

    Membership in the community is a commitment to yourself and the entire community with the provision that members are consciously awake and on a continuous path of self-realization and self-improvement.

    Read More...
  • Orientation

    The orientation program is designed to help each member prepare for the challenges of life in a remote, off-the-grid, and self-sustainable environment.

    Read More...
  • Spiritual

    The community is founded on the principle of being consciously responsible in every action, a principle that applies equally to the individual member and to the community as a whole.

    Read More...
  • Gardening

    Food production for the community can best be defined as growing fruits and vegetables with nuts and Spirulina (blue-green algae) to provide additional sources of nutrition, fat, and protein.

    Read More...
  • Education

    To Project TriStar, the goal of life and the community is to achieve the highest possible levels of conscious evolution through personal education, also known as "experiential learning".

    Read More...
  • Management

    Project TriStar is a corporation with a Board of Directors and management teams that are responsible for the community planning, development, and day-to-day operations.

    Read More...
  • Fabrication

    The community is designed to manufacture everything that may be necessary to maintain the desired lifestyle, community operations, and to ensure the health and well being of the community members.

    Read More...

Why Project TriStar?

Project TriStar is an off-the-grid, eco-friendly, sustainable, and spiritual community that provides a safe and harmonious lifestyle for those who choose to live their lives based on natural and universal laws.

The intent of the Project TriStar initiative is to create a lifestyle and an environment that supports the community goals of self sufficiency, healthy living, mutual respect, individual responsibility, and personal growth.

 

Read More

The Top 10 Harmful Side Effects of Caffeine
Which is in Coffee and Unhealthy Energy Drinks

 

Caffeine makes your heart beat abnormally fast which is very harmful for people who have high blood pressure or a history of heart disease.


Caffeine constricts the blood vessels in your brain causing many people in get massive headaches.


Caffeine is a strong diuretic causing your body to become dehydrated and the #1 symptom of dehydration is fatigue.


Some people experience tremors after drinking caffeine. That’s thought to be due to over-activation of the central nervous system.


One recent report from the US revealed that women who drink in excess of one cup of coffee every day are only half as likely to be able to get pregnant as those who drink no coffee at all.


The odds are considerably worse if women drink more than two cups a day. Then they are nearly 5 times less likely to be able to get pregnant as women who drink no coffee at all.


Caffeine can cause tension or stiffness in your neck, shoulders, jaw, hands, legs or stomach.


Caffeine can cause mood swings or periods of depression during the day.


Caffeine can cause coldness in the extremities, especially in your hands and feet because it restricts circulation. This is very common side effect in women.


Caffeine can cause you to wake up feeling tired because it inhibits your bodies ability to sleep properly and get into REM sleep. Caffeine may also cause insomnia.

Over 400 billion cups of coffee are consumed every year, making it the world’s most popular beverage. In the United States alone, about 107 million people — over 52% of the population — drink coffee every day. Another 57 million people drink coffee at least occasionally.

Harmful Side-Effects of Alcohol

 

BRAIN: Drinking can cause neuropathy and dementia, as well as impairing balance and memory and lead to depression, anxiety and insomnia.


THROAT: Alcohol can cause irritation and damage to the oesophagusand lead to haemorrhaging, pain and difficulty swallowing.


HEART: Alcohol raises blood pressure and increases the risk of stroke and heart disease in heavy drinkers.


LIVER: Liver deterioration, the formation of fibrous scar tissue (fibrosis), alcoholic hepatitis, irreversible liver damage (cirrhosis) and jaundice of the skin and eyes are all potential effects of heavy alcohol consumption.


STOMACH: Drinkers can suffer from irritated stomach lining and stomach ulcers.


PANCREAS: Drinking can lead to inflammation of the pancreas - a potentially fatal condition.


KIDNEYS: Alcohol enlarges the kidneys, alters hormone functions and increases the risk of kidney failure.


SEXUAL HEALTH: Erectile dysfunction and infertility (reduced sperm count) can be common with regular alcohol consumption. In women, drinking can lead to menstrual difficulties, decreased fertility and early menopause.


SKIN: Drinking can cause middle-age acne to develop. It also causes small blood vessels in the skin to widen, allowing more blood to flow close to the skin's surface - producing a flushed skin color.


NUTRITION: Excessive drinking increases the risk of malnutrition. The body suffers low intakes of protein, calcium, iron, vitamin A, vitamin C, thiamine, vitamin B6 and riboflavin. The high sugar level (processed white sugar) is highly harmful causing a chain reaction of adrenal depletion, nervous system imbalance, hormonal imbalance and eventually diabetes.


CANCER Heavy drinking increases risk of gouty arthritis and increases the risk of cancer in the liver, pancreas, rectum, breast, mouth, larynx and oesophagus.

Drugs

 

Project TriStar is about natural evolution of consciousness, not artificially stimulated. Drugs and stimulants of any form are a dependency on the physical level, and Project TriStar is all about freedom from dependency and acceleration of consciousness in the most pure forms.

As we approach the cosmic alignment with the galactic equator, a tremendous amount of D.M.T. will naturally be release in the brain causing major transformation at the soul level, as well as on the emotional, psychological and physical levels.

Drugs used for spiritual growth purposes are often called “medicine” in certain cultures. Using any external enhancement for acceleration in consciousness may provide breakthroughs, however, the recovery from the Etheric body damage is fare more harmful than the breakthrough itself. The emotional, physical and psychological body has to mature to access these higher frequencies of energy provided from the drug effect. This results in slowing down the spiritual ascension and the physical expansion. Why would an authentic seeker of the ultimate truth and freedom choose such devastating and temporary shortcut, when we know that the ultimate reality of infinite freedom and bliss dwells within us permanently? Project TriStar Community embraces an authentic desire to grow spiritually free from any external substances.

Medical prescriptions which alter our consciousness such as anti-depressants, sleeping pills, pain killers, etc…, are equally harmful and keep us num therefore unable to process self destructive pattern or reach higher state of consciousness.

Flesh Foods Cause Degenerative Disease

 

The habitual and frequent use of large amounts of flesh foods in the diet is actually one of the causes of degenerative disease in a substantial percentage of the population. The decrease in, or elimination of, flesh foods from the diet is one of the important steps toward optimal health.

Man's anatomy and physiology are poorly adapted to the processing of meat, and it cannot be done without some putrefaction (in addition to the putrefaction already present in the meat at the time it is consumed). The result is toxemia, which is the starting point of degenerative diseases like gout, arthritis, heart disease, hardening of the arteries, stroke, osteoporosis, cancer, etc.

Anatomical and Physiological Basis for Rejecting Flesh Foods

 

There is a sound anatomical and physiological basis for the recommendation against the consumption of flesh foods. The human anatomy and digestive system are totally dissimilar from those of carnivores, which have sharp claws and teeth for killing and tearing. Carnivorous animals have short intestinal canals, and strong secretions of hydrochloric acid, so as to quickly digest and expel the waste products of the flesh they consume, before putrefaction can occur.

Flesh-eating animals also have the enzyme uricase, which breaks down uric acid into a harmless substance called allantoin; man does not possess this enzyme. Vegetable proteins, including nuts and seeds, contain enough carbohydrates to render this enzyme unnecessary.

The carbohydrate content of nuts also prevents a process called de-amination. Because the carbohydrate content of flesh foods is negligible, conventional nutritionists advocate eating protein with a carbohydrate since it is thought that the presence of carbohydrates is necessary for the digestion of protein and, when none are present, the liver will break down some of the amino acids and convert them to carbohydrates. If this is true (and the experiments have not been conclusive), then it is obvious that the nuts supplied to us by Nature come completely packaged along with their digestive requirements, while flesh foods do not.

Lesson 18 of this course includes a preliminary discussion of this subject and contains an interesting chart, "Classification of Animals," which is an effective demonstration of the fact that man is not a carnivore.

One of the comparisons that is made in this chart is the length of the alimentary canals, which are three times the length of the body in the carnivora, ten times the length of the body in the omnivora, and twelve times the length of the body in the anthropoid apes and in humans. These figures, of course, are approximate. Gray's anatomy gives the length of the human alimentary canal as approximately thirty feet.

Hereward Carrington, in The Natural Food of Man, says that some have made the blunder of calling the proportionate length of the human alimentary canal one to six instead of one to twelve, by doubling the height through measuring humans while they are standing erect. He says, "This measurement is evidently wrong, for it includes the length of the lower extremities, or hind legs, whereas, in other animals, the measurement is made from the tip of the nose to the end of the backbone."

The human digestive tract is about four times as long as in the carnivorous animal. The gastric juices of humans have less active antiseptic and germicidal properties. The intestine of the carnivore is short and smooth, to dissolve food rapidly and pass it out of the system. The human digestive tract is corrugated or sacculated, for the express purpose of retaining the food as long as possible in the intestine until all possible nutriment has been extracted from it.

These (and the other anatomical and physiological characteristics of the human digestive system) are the worst possible conditions for the processing of flesh foods. The excessive secretion of bile (necessitated for the digestion of flesh foods) may result in the premature breakdown of the liver, and the large quantities of uric acid created by a flesh diet may have disastrous effects on the kidneys. Dr. Robert Perk says that the excess of uric acid "causes contraction of the minute blood vessels, resulting in high arterial tension and often the blocking of the blood vessels by the uric acid. This results in serious interference with the circulation and blood supply to the tissues and throws great strain on the vital organs, especially the heart and kidneys." (Scientific Vegetarianism, Szekely, p.44)

Morbid Results of Eating Flesh Foods

 

Meat is the most putrefactive of all foods. Flesh, when eaten by humans, tends to undergo a process of decay in the stomach, causing a poisoning of the blood. Putrefaction in meat eaters is evidenced by bad breath, heartburn, eructations, and the foul stool and odorous emissions—absent in vegetarians—and it is probable that the attempts of the body to eliminate these wastes has a profound influence on the shortening of man's life span.

If the body fluid that bathes our cell's is overloaded with waste, causing an excessive secretion of bile—fatigue, weakening and aging are the inevitable results. The accumulation of toxic substances in the body causes the deterioration of the intestinal flora, and the blood vessels gradually lose their natural elasticity—their walls become hardened and thickened. Irreversible damage to the organism proliferates.

Can You Face The Ugly Truth About Meat?

 

Meats contain waste products that the animal did not get to eliminate, and toxic hormones and fluids released into the blood stream and tissues at the moment of the death of the terrified animal.

An animal's cellular life continues after death. The cells continue to produce waste materials which are trapped in the blood and decaying tissues. The nitrogenous extracts which are trapped in the animal's muscles are partially responsible for the flavor of the cooked meat.

Humans who eat the livers of the animals are bombarded with an even greater concentration of waste products and toxic substances. The liver, being the filtering organ of the body, is loaded with elements the body cannot use, which are trapped in the liver and remain there. Liver eaters are treated to higher concentrations of mercury and artificial hormones, plus other "goodies" that remain in the animal's disposal system.

Liver increases, even more than muscle meat, the amount of creatine in the urine. Creatinuria (abnormal amounts of creatine in the urine) is involved in endocrine (glandular) disorders.

Meat not only harbors the bacteria infecting the living animal, but it may also carry molds, spores, yeasts and bacilli picked up during postmortem handling.

A book on meat processing explains that the flesh becomes more tender and palatable by the process of ripening, hanging and maturing (aging). Vic Sussman, in The Vegetarian Alternative, pp. 149-150, says, "Few meat eaters would like to hear the words putrefaction, rigor mortis, and rotting applied to their sirloin and pot roast. But flesh is flesh, though the euphemisms ripening, toughening and enzymatic action are kinder to the ear."

Trained government inspectors use sight, smell and touch in a constant battle to protect meat eaters from intentional and accidental abuses. But effective regulation of flesh food is enormously difficult. Sussman says (p. 151) "Even the most conscientious inspectors are forced by circumstances and the pressure of time to let suspect carcasses leave the plant."

Those who eat processed meats also get many of the odds and ends of the animals—eyes, ears, bladders, lips, udders, snouts and parts of the bones and skin. Not even a meat inspector can tell from what part of the body the sausages and frankfurters came—it is all meat tissue, and all legal. (Woolsey, Meat on the Menu…, pp. 21-22.)

In his pediatrics textbook, Dr. Emmet L. Holt of New York City says that if two dogs were put on a leash and one fed water and the other beef tea, the dog getting the water would live longer, because beef tea does not contain any nourishment if the fat is skimmed off, but does contain urinary wastes, which poison the dog.

Owen S. Parrette, M.D., in Why I Don't Eat Meat, p. 13, says that when he was a medical student, the class was given glass test tubes to be used for growing bacteria that are present in human diseases such as typhoid, staphylocci, and bubonic plague. "The professor had us make up some beef tea, pour a little into each test tube, and place a cotton cork on top. We sterilized the tubes and later inoculated them with these dangerous bacteria. The germs all thrived on the beef tea. It was a perfect medium for them."

Carrington also says (p. 109), "Meat-eating is the more or less direct cause of various diseases." The tapeworm embryos are carried by beef, pork and fish. The deadly trichina parasite is found mainly in pork, but also in fish, fowl and other meats. Trichinosis closely resembles cerebro-spinal meningitis. Tuberculosis has been communicated from cattle, typhoid fever from oysters. Epilepsy has been traced to meat-eating.

Twenty-six diseases, including salmonellosis, staphylococcus and psittacosis, are known to be common to both man and poultry. (Meat on the Menu..., Woolsey, p. 27.)

Since little or no progress has been made in eradicating these dangers, the only people who are immune are those who never eat meat. Authorities recognize that the basic problem is with the nature of the product itself. The National Academy of Science reports, "Reluctantly, we are forced to recognize the infeasibility of eradicating salmonellosis at this time." ("An evaluation of the Salmonella Problem," National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C., 1969)

The late Dr. John Harvey Kellogg said, when he sat down to his vegetarian meal, "It is nice to eat a meal and not have to worry about what your food may have died from."

Meat-Eating Predisposes to Disease

 

In addition to directly causing certain diseases, meat-eating also predisposes the body to disease. In pestilences of any character, meat-eaters are the chief sufferers. Wounds heal far more rapidly in vegetarian soldiers. Carnivores are far more subject to blood poisoning than are vegetarians. Vegetarians survive major operations more frequently than meat-eaters. (Carrington, pp. 111-112).

John A. Scharffenberg, M.D., in Problems with Meat says, "Meat is a major factor in the leading causes of death in the United States, and probably in similarly affluent societies. In fact, next to tobacco and alcohol, meat is the greatest single cause of mortality in the United States." He makes this statement on p. 101 of his well-documented book, in summarizing "the formidable and persuasive scientific evidence we now have." He marshals this scientific evidence of the disease potential of meat and the relationship of meat to these specific problems: atherosclerosis, cancer, decrease in longevity or life expectancy, kidney disorders, osteoporosis, salmonellosis, and trichinosis. He quotes an editorial statement in the Journal of the American Medical Association: "A vegetarian diet can prevent 97% of our coronary occlusions." (Editor: Diet and Stress in Vascular Disease, JAMA, 76:134-35, 1961).

Several more recent, well-organized studies have identified the risk factors of atherosclerosis and heart attacks: a 1970 study by twenty-nine voluntary health agencies, in cooperation with the American Medical Association (these study groups consisted of many of the nation's top scientists); a 1977 study by the Senate Select Committee on Nutrition and Human Needs: a twelve-year Finnish Mental Hospital Study (Effect of cholesterol-lowering diet on mortality from coronary heart disease and other causes, Lancet 2:835-38, 1972); and a 1975 study comparing Seventh Day Adventists who had different dietary habits. The Seventh Day Adventist study revealed a 64% vulnerability to coronary heart disease in meat-users, 40% for lacto--vegetarians, and 23% for total vegetarians. The 1977 study by the Senate Select Committee on Nutrition and Human Needs reported the significant deleterious influence of. consumption of dietary cholesterol (animal fat) and recommended the increased use of fruits, vegetables and whole grains, and a decrease in the use of foods containing saturated fat (animal fat).

Meat-Based Diet Presents Complex
And Grave Nutritional Problems

 

Even beyond the grave dangers presented by meat-based diets is the misconception that meat is an ideal nutritional source against which vegetable proteins are measured and found wanting. The fact is that it is much more difficult to have even a reasonably good diet with meat than without it.

"Complete Protein" Status of Meat?

 

In the first place, even the much vaunted "complete protein" status of meat is, at best, based on a colossal error (if not a hoax). The complete protein of the animal could exist only if the animal were consumed raw and whole. Meat-eating animals eat the blood, bones, cartilages, liver, etc. of their prey—not just the muscle and fat. They eat it raw—so that they do not lose any of the mineral elements. The muscle meats (most commonly consumed by humans) are grossly inadequate as a protein source.

On the other hand, humans who eat the livers of the animals don't win either. As previously indicated, those who eat liver are exposed to greater concentrations of morbid substances. Even though liver is touted as an optimal source of such substances as iron, Vitamin A and Vitamin B-12, it can hardly be regarded as anything remotely resembling wholesome food.

For years, conventional nutritionists have maintained that complete and optimal nutrition is assured on a diet using animal foods as the primary source of protein, and that a vegetarian diet presents many problems. Dr. Scharffenberg produces well-documented scientific evidence (Problems with Meat) indicating that the truth is exactly the opposite

Meat Deficiencies & Excesses

 

Meat is deficient in vitamins, minerals, fiber and carbohydrates and is excessively high in fat and concentrated protein.

Meat is one of the main sources of food that provide little fiber—flesh foods lengthen the average transit time through the gastrointestinal tract from thirty hours to seventy-seven hours

Colon cancer patients produce more than normal amounts of bile acids which enhance cancer growth. A more rapid transit time through the digestive tract reduces exposure time to these acids.

Meat contains virtually no carbohydrates and is excessively high in fat and concentrated protein.

Dr. Bircher-Benner, the great Swiss physician, said, "Meat does not give strength. Its composition is one-sided, lacking certain minerals and vitamins, and it introduces too much fat and protein into the system, disturbing the balance of nutrition and giving rise to intestinal putrefaction."

Meat is Highly Stimulating and Innutritious

 

Hereward Carrington, The Natural Food of Man, p. 114, says, "In the first place it must be pointed out and insisted upon that meat is a highly stimulating article of food, and for that reason, innutritious. Stimulation and nutrition invariably exist in inverse ratio—the more the one, the less the other, and vice versa. The very fact, then, that meat is a stimulant, as it is now universally conceded to be, shows us that it is more or less an innutritious article of diet, and that the supposed "strength" we receive from the meat is due entirely to the stimulating effects upon the system of the various poisons, or toxic substances, introduced into the system, together with the meat. It is for this reason that those who leave off meat and become vegetarians experience a feeling of lassitude and weakness for the first few days—they lack the stimulation formerly supplied, and now notice the reaction which invariably follows such stimulation. This feeling of weakness, or "all-goneness," is therefore to be expected, and is in no way a proof that the diet is weakening the patient. Let him persist in his reformed manner of living for some time, and he will find that this reaction wears off, and that a general and continued feeling of energy and well-being follow."

Results of High Protein Diets

 

Organism Subjected to Toxic Byproducts

 

Protein is the most complex of all food elements, and its utilization is the most complicated. People with impaired digestions will find it preferable to ingest a lesser quantity of concentrated protein, which they are capable of utilizing, rather than a greater quantity, which not only cannot be processed efficiently, but which may poison the body. When protein is eaten in greater amounts than the body is capable of utilizing, the organism is subjected to the toxic byproducts of protein metabolism, which it has been unable to eliminate—and the inevitable result is degenerative disease.

The tremendous amounts of protein frequently recommended—75 to 100 grams daily (or more)—are far in excess of the body's needs, and are the source of much trouble.

The famous nutritionists Dr. Ragnar Berg, Dr. R. Chittenden, Dr. M. Hindehede, Dr. M. Hegsted, Dr. William C. Rose, and others, have shown in extensive experiments that our actual need for protein is somewhere around thirty grams a day, or even less. Many leading contempporary scientists and nutritionists in Europe, such as Dr. Ralph Bircher, Dr. Bircher-Benner, Dr. Otto Buchinger, Jr., Dr. H. Karstrom, Prof. H.A. Schweigart, Dr. Karl-Otto Aly, and many others, are in full agreement with the findings of Drs. Berg, Chittenden, Rose, et al, and are recommending a low protein diet as the diet most conducive to good health.

High Incidence of Degenerative Diseases

 

The Seventh-Day Adventists and The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, who advocate a low animal-protein diet, have fifty to seventy per cent lower death rates than those of average Americans. They also are reported to have a much lower incidence of cancer, tuberculosis, coronary diseases, blood and kidney disease, and diseases of the digestive and respiratory organs.

Negative Lime Balance (Calcium Transfer)

 

Bone calcium is at dangerously low levels in those using meat as compared to vegetarians, especially in people over fifty. A high-protein diet (especially meat protein) increases the urinary excretion of calcium. Thus vegetarians are less prone to osteoporosis (porous bones).

H. J. Curtis' Biological Mechanism of Aging gives documentation of the role of high protein diets, particularly animal protein, in causing osteoporosis. Calcium is transferred from the hard tissues (bones) to the soft tissues (arteries, skin, joints, internal organs and eyes). The transfer of calcium to the soft tissues results in catastrophic fractures, hardening of the arteries, wrinkling of skin, arthritis, the formation of stones, cataracts, high blood pressure, degeneration of internal organs, loss of hearing, senility and cancer.

A study of elderly female vegetarians at Michigan State University showed they lost less bone to osteoporosis than a group of the same age that ate meat.

Researchers at the University of Wisconsin found that when the protein intake of young men was raised to 140 grams per day, they all proceeded to lose bone calcium, even though they took liberal amounts of calcium and magnesium supplements and protein extracts which contained no fat and little phosphorus—the supplements didn't help at all.

Young men had strong bone retention with protein intake of around fifty grams per day—only a reduction in protein consumption avoids the threat of osteoporosis.

Athletes who eat much meat are especially susceptible to arthrosis, a degenerative process of the joints. Among twenty conventional-diet professional football players who were observed for eighteen years, 100% incidence of ankle arthrosis and 97.5% of knee arthrosis were found.

A negative lime balance is easily produced by increased protein supply. The eminently important minerals—potassium and magnesium—are known to be deficient in an every day diet rich in meat, eggs, cheese, fat, sugar and grains, but richly present in a full-value vegetarian diet predominating in raw food.

Rapid Maturation and Early Death

 

Examples are repeatedly cited of robust and apparently healthy individuals who are heavy meat-eaters. Dr. L.H. Newberg of Ann Arbor University found that when he fed large quantities of meat to test animals, they grew bigger and more alert than other animals on a vegetarian diet. But three months later these animals contracted kidney damage and died, while the vegetarian animals lived on healthily and happily. (Wade, C., Vegetarianism, Herald of Health, LXXII, Ap. 1967, p. 14)

Accelerated growth = accelerated maturity, accelerated degeneration and accelerated demise. Rapid growth and short life go together, verified by repeated studies and experiments.

Since rapid maturation occurs as a result of high protein diets, this produces earlier onset of menstruation. Girls who start menstruation before thirteen have a 4.2 times greater incidence of cancer than those who start several years later. In countries with higher meat fat consumption, breast cancer mortality rates increase, and there is a higher incidence of colon and prostate cancer.

It must be emphasized that diet alone is not the single component in cancer and other degenerative diseases, but optimal nutrition does play a fundamental and preventive role, and faulty dietary habits play a causative role.

Kofranyi of the Max Planck Institute in Russia proved that complete nitrogen balance and performance ability could be maintained on 25 grams of protein daily, and Oomen and Hipsley found a population that develops not just full health, but magnificent structure and corresponding physical performance on 15 to 20 grams of protein daily.

The High-Protein Hoax

 

Dr. Bircher-Benner describes the method used by the American Research Council's Food and Nutrition Board to agree on a daily requirement for adults of seventy grams, found in their tables.

Sherman, a member of the board, said that evidence pointed toward a much lower amount, somewhere around thirty-five grams. But if the protein requirement had been set so low, there would have been a public outcry. And so, a corresponding "margin of safety" was adopted, and "seventy grams" was published. Because the scientific basis for this was nonexistent, the word "recommendation" was used instead of "requirement." Of course it was publicly interpreted as the requirement, in fact, as the minimum.

"The smallest amount of food able to keep the body in a state of high efficiency is physiologically the most economical, and thus best adapted for the body's needs." This is the Chittenden concept, stated years ago by Russell Henry Chittenden, which applies forcibly to protein. The average American diet contains 45% more protein than even the National Academy of Sciences recommends, and is certainly not "best adapted for the body's needs."

Insoluble Problems of Meat-Based Diets

 

Flesh eating is defended almost entirely on the premise that it is a source of superior proteins. The truth is exactly opposite. The pathological effects of encumbering our bodies with the proteins of other animals is Nature's method of vetoing these proteins for human consumption, in order to promote the stability of the human species and to protect the health of the individual. Dr. Herbert M. Shelton says (Animal Foods—booklet) that allergy and anaphylaxis (see definition) are not mysterious; they are due to long-standing poisoning of the body by excess or inappropriate protein foods.

Animal proteins are often not reduced to their constituent amino acids, but are absorbed in more complex form. Absorption by the body of such partially digested proteins poisons the organism, and so-called "allergic symptoms" may be the result—or gout, arthritis, cancer, or any one or more of a host of degenerative diseases.

A meat-eater must also be concerned about digestive problems caused by too little dietary fiber; circulatory problems due to excessive cholesterol deposits from animal fats; loss of bone mass due to inadequate ingestion and retention of calcium; deficiency of vitamins and minerals; and inadequate carbohydrate intake (without increasing calories).

Planet Earth - The Effects Eating Meat Has On Our Planet

 

Back to the Health Resources

 

 

 

 

 

Where Will It Be Safe?

 

Island Locations: The most obvious risk to living on an island is the basic fact that islands are the exposed top portion of submerged mountains. The relative risk is related to the probability of a geographic pole shift or any other cosmic or geological event that could create shifts in Earth’s crust, massive earthquakes, or movement of fault lines and tectonic plates. Any one of these events would likely result in the movement of large amounts of water around the world.

 

 

 

We’ve all seen the consequences of such events in our lifetime with the earthquakes followed by tsunamis in Sumatra in 2004 and Japan in 2011. Click here for an interactive view of the before and after images from the 2011 tsunami in Japan.

Before and after images from Samatra tsunami in 2004

Before and after images from Japan tsunami in 2011

 

The greatest risk is the fact that islands are the tops of submerged mountains that are either part of an entire mountain range or a volcanic ridge. In either case, islands are positioned directly on or near major fault lines in the Earth’s crust. The sudden movement of these underwater fault lines or tectonic plates creates shock waves which are then transferred from the rock vibrations into water vibrations or waves called tsunamis.

 

Besides the destruction from tsunamis experienced in our lifetime, there are numerous references to ancient events from the forces of water. When Columbus visited the islands in the Bahamas, he wrote that every culture had a similar story about a time when the oceans wiped out virtually all life on the islands. Of course, we must also consider that some people must have survived to pass these stories down through history. We also have references in the Bible and many other ancient scriptures about a great flood that reached virtually every continent. You could also speculate that such events account for why there is little or no trace of ancient civilizations ever existing on Easter Island, the UK, or any other island for that matter.

 

Many in the scientific community might dispute the historic existence of global flood events in past history; however, others have concluded that such events have occurred in our past. A recent book entitled “CATACLYSM!: Compelling Evidence of a Catastrophic Event in 9500 B.C.” contains scientific evidence of such an event. This book combines geological and archeological research to support their finding of a global cataclysm event about 12,000 years ago which ravaged the planet with the destructive force of shifting in Earth’s crust and from water. The authors of this book also concluded that a majority of human and animal life was eradicated in this event.

 

By now, it should be no surprise to anyone that Earth’s magnetic poles are moving and that the affects of such a shift are relatively unknown. Many people may also be aware that magnetic pole shifts have occurred in Earth’s past history. Likewise, it’s also true that the geographic poles have been located in different positions around the planet. This is evident by observing entire regions and continents that have been transformed from tropical to frozen and visa versa. In fact, it is common knowledge that the North Pole has moved from the Northern U.S. into Northern Canada and could be why Mammoth's and Rhino's have been found frozen in Russia with fresh grass still in their mouths.

 

What most theorists and scientists don’t generally agree on is whether magnetic pole shifts and geographic pole shifts are related or occur in close proximity to one another, how long they take to occur, and how far they move. From a position of probability, there is no proof that a geological pole shift will occur through the coming events; however, the probability of Earth being influenced by some external force has real scientific backing. If such an event were to occur, it is very likely to result in massive shifts in Earth’s crust and possibly catastrophic movement of mountains, mountain ranges, volcanoes, and islands.

 

From a prophetic point of view, the predicted events are similar to those that have been passed on through history. The great heat that scorches the Earth, massive die off of life, great earthquakes, and great floods. In fact, if you believe at all in the Bible prophecy, known as “Revelations”, then the simple statement that “all mountains and island will be moved” may be all the explanation that is needed. If you believe in a physical pole shift, then you must also believe in the corresponding shift in Earth's crust. This means that any mountain range (also know as islands) will be thrust either upwards or downwards as they are on the exact fault lines where these movements occur. This is also how entire continents or portions of continents could theoretically be either submerged into the ocean or pushed upward from the bottom of the oceans.

The speed of such events is also relevant to the potential risks. Depending on how fast the potential events occur will affect all of the possible consequences. If it occurs slowly over a hundred or thousand years, then risk of tsunamis may not be a issue for anyone except those living in coastal areas. Although scientific evidence indicates past events have occurred rapidly and the resulting tsunamis wiped out most everything across the entire planet, there is no way to know for sure what will happen this time.

If continents such as Atlantis and Lemuria really existed, you can get a picture of just how severe the shifting of Earth’s crust and continents may be. Even if you don’t believe in Lemuria or Atlantis, one must consider the fact that there are ancient cities under every ocean on the planet. And although most people may be unaware of these underwater cities, the reality is that they exist and were above water at some time in our past. This may also explain why most ancient maps depict islands and land masses that are not visible today.

 

The potential for upward and downward movement in the coming events should be considered with equal sincerity as those that have been proven to occur in the past. The resulting tsunamis from such movement present a serious risk to any islands and coastal regions.

If you consider the speeds (up to 500mph) and forces (wall of water 50-100 meters high) of a tsunami created by massive shifts in Earth’s crust, it’s easy to see how the risk from such events is unimaginable. The physics of hydrodynamics (the study of motion of liquids) is far too complex to describe here with any meaning, however, the only real question s are how far inland and how high a tsunami might climb a mountain in its path?

 

There are those that would like to believe a tsunami will flow around an island rather than flow over the top. Those who are familiar with hydrodynamics know that although some water may be deflected around the peak of the mountain, the majority of the force will move in a straight line up the mountainside and depending on the terrain, may move through and possibly over the island. Of course, combining the possibility of extreme upward and downward movement with the potential for massive tsunamis represents a very high risk to island life.

The most important factor when making any decisions is learning how to balance our intellectual knowledge with our intuition. Basing any decision on one without the other is only utilizing part of your consciousness. By understanding the physical possibilities of these times and combining that with the spiritual possibilities of these times, anyone can make an informed decision about choosing a location. This means that it is important to gain knowledge and wisdom about Earth’s history and your inner self before making any decision.

 

Those who make decisions without putting in this effort may explain why so few people survived the previous cataclysmic events. Here is an example: Only after the extensive research to create this “Where Will It Be Safe?” document, did it become obvious that the highest risk locations are in mountainous regions. This was an unexpected observation. Realizing that islands are simply the tops of mountains may be enough for some people to draw the same conclusion; however, we hope this write-up provides any additional information necessary to make an informed decision about choosing your location.

For more information on the risks for mountainous regions, please refer to our write up on Mountain Locations.

Back to Top

Where Will It Be Safe?

 

Mountain Locations: When considering a mountainous location, it’s easy to imagine a nicely wooded area with open fields and valleys, adequate fresh water from rivers, stream, or lakes; fertile land for planting and grazing, wildlife and natural vegetation for easy harvesting, and reasonable protection from the elements. The criteria for considering a mountainous region would include: altitude, weather and temperatures, vegetation, wildlife, resources such as wood and water, and possibly remoteness.

 

 

 

What people don’t often realize is that mountainous regions include tremendous risks if any of the possible cosmic or Earth events do occur. In fact, mountainous regions contain the highest risks of any location besides low lying areas in close proximity to the ocean or large bodies of water.

Why? To consider the risks, let’s first consider that mountains are created because they are directly on or near major fault lines in Earth’s crust. Such locations are also exactly where the magma under the crust is able to find openings which we know as volcanoes.

In school, we were all taught that most mountain ranges were created by fault lines moving in slight amounts over long periods of time. Further that minor earthquakes caused movement in these fault lines which translated into upward or downward movement of the mountains in a few millimeters per year over periods of millions of years. Of course, this is what we were taught, however, the geological and physical evidence speaks quite differently.

How many people know that you can find sea shells on many mountain tops and even entire layers of oceanic fossils in some mountainous areas? How many people are aware of the evidence that some mountain ranges have moved up or down 3,000 to 9,000 meters (10,000 to 26,000 ft) in a single cataclysmic event? Although many in the scientific community might continue to dispute that such events have occurred in Earth’s past, the geological evidence speaks for itself.

 

 

A recent book entitled “CATACLYSM!: Compelling Evidence of a Catastrophic Event in 9500 B.C.” contains scientific proof of such an event. This book combines geological and archeological research to support their finding of a global cataclysm event about 12,000 years ago which ravaged the planet with the destructive force of shifting in Earth’s crust and from water. The authors of this book have drawn on the previous research of numerous geologist and carbon dating to conclude that some mountain regions below the ocean were recently at above sea level and many that were at sea level are now towering over our landscapes.

In other words, the story we were told in school that mountains move up or down a few millimeters per year over periods of millions of years is not the whole truth and may be a complete fabrication.

If the foundation of this research is to consider whether mountainous regions are high risk locations considering the possible Earth and cosmic events, then the possibility that they could be thrust upwards or downwards, in the order of 10,000 to 26,000 feet, instantly must rank right up there with the extinction of the dinosaurs! Is such an event the foundation for the “Great Earthquake” from the Bible and other prophecy?

Now let’s consider some of the other natural risks. Besides earthquakes, additional risks to mountainous regions include: volcanoes, fire, flash floods, as well as mud and rock slides.

 

 

 

Of all these potential risks, volcanoes are probably the easiest to eliminate when choosing a mountainous location. Why? Because most volcanoes are well documented or even highly visible with the naked eye. In this case, some simple research and observation can eliminate any risk from being too close to a volcanic region. The only problem is that virtually all mountain regions are highly susceptible to volcanic activity due to the nature of how they are created from a weakness in the crust called fault lines. Even if you do not find active volcanoes, many mountainous regions are known for their “hot springs” which are the result of magma in close proximity to the surface (i.e. volcanic activity).

 

If you look around the world today you will see evidence of massive rock slides on virtually every mountain region on the planet. Evidence of mud and rock slides is so dramatic that you can even see them from space. Just go to Google Earth and zoom in on any mountain range in the world.

 

 

When you visit some of these locations in person, you can instantly become awed by the amount of energy that would be required to create such slides which supports the evidence of cataclysmic events that have moved entire mountain ranges. In some cases, the terrain is steep enough and the rocks small enough to imagine how a slight earthquake could have caused the slide. However, in many cases, it’s obvious by the size of the rocks and vastness of the slides that they must have been created by much greater events than just your average earthquake.

In most mountainous regions, we have not witnessed anything on the scale that must have occurred to create the existing slides and formations. Probably the greatest example of such cataclysmic events is what happened in the mountains of China in May 2003. The below satellite image is a before and after from the 7.9 magnitude earthquake that struck the mountain region of China in May of 2003. In these images, red is vegetation and brown is either dirt, mud, or rock. As you can see from these images, the earthquake caused massive mud and rock slides in the mountain regions, destroying crops, forests, villages, and killing over 70,000 people.

This event in China was the result of heavy rains which saturated the soils and then a 7.9 magnitude earthquake which caused the saturated soils to experience liquefaction and eventually slide. Such events bring to light the next topic of discussion which is rain, soil saturation, and liquefaction.

Rain and soils saturation is the root cause of all mudslides and probably most rock slides in the world. Liquefaction can occur simply as a result of heavy rains even without an earthquake as seen in this September 2010 video of a mudslide in a remote village in Italy.

Liquefaction caused by heavy rain in Italy, Sept 2010

Liquefaction can also occur in low elevation areas as well which can be seen in the following videos from the March 2011 earthquake induced liquefaction in Japan and from the February 2011 earthquake induced liquefaction in Christchurch, New Zealand.

Liquefaction caused by Earthquake in Japan, Mar 2011, 9.0 earthquake

Liquefaction example in Christchurch, New Zealand, Feb 2011, 6.3 earthquake

In other words, liquefaction does not require an earthquake to occur; however, the combination of elevation, rain, and earthquakes creates a formula for disaster and the greatest risk to mountainous regions.

If this evidence is not enough, now imagine the possibility of solar storms, volcanic ash, or other cosmic forces that create the perfect situation for heavy rainfall. With the potential conditions that have been predicted for these coming times and events, experiencing rainy conditions beyond anything we have seen in modern history is a very real possibility.

 

 

 

There is also evidence that such heavy rains have occurred in ancient history if you consider references in the Bible to be possible. In the time of Noah and the Great Flood as referenced in the Bible, it was written that Earth experienced a rain that lasted for 40 days and 40 nights. Although difficult, at best, to imagine such a torrential downpour, it is not unrealistic when considering the possible cosmic and Earth events that could occur during these times.

 

We are already seeing unusual weather patterns affecting the entire planet as the weather appears to be flipping and changing dramatically in many regions. Some might say this is the result of El Nina, El Nino, cyclical solar activity, and even possibly as a result of the magnetic pole movement. Whatever the rational, these ongoing events are often reported to be within some statistical probability, but what happens when events occur that are outside of all scientific and statistical understanding? These are exactly the events that can not be predicted, but only speculated.

 

 

 

 

Now imagine the possibility of an event that causes the Sun to release excessive solar radiation beyond something ever recorded in history. Then imagine how solar radiation affects our weather by drawing moisture from the oceans which are deposited as rain on the landscape. Although less likely, any volcanic activity can also cause heavy ash clouds to form which, in turn, are known to be a catalyst for creating rain storms.

In other words, the potential to experience periods of 40 days and 40 nights of rain are very real. Such an event would saturate all soils beyond anything that scientist and geologists could imagine. The subsoil saturation and liquefaction from such an event would be beyond imagination and cause massive mudslides and flash flooding of all ravines, canyons, and mountainous valleys. To give a perspective on the potential for devastating conditions, just imagine any of the known liquefaction videos or events in recorded history, magnified about 400 times.

The 7.9 earthquake in China on May 2003 and the resulting mudslides is only an example and pales in comparison to the possible devastation that would occur from 40 days and 40 nights of continuous rain. Even without an earthquake, such an event would cause entire mountainsides to liquefy and slide. By adding the motion from even a small earthquake would create an exponentially more devastating event. However, when speaking about a potential earthquake or earthquakes with magnitudes beyond our imagination, the risk to mountainous regions becomes exponentially worse.

The concept of a Great Earthquake, as referenced in many ancient scriptures including the Bible, is not unrealistic. We’ve already mentioned how there is scientific evidence of a global cataclysm event about 12,000 years ago which ravaged the planet with the destructive force of shifting in Earth’s crust. This research and evidence prove that some mountain ranges where thrust upwards or downwards 10,000 to 26,000 feet in a cataclysmic event of very short duration. Such an event is likely the foundation for the “Great Earthquake” as written in Biblical prophecy?

It doesn’t take much to imagine the disastrous consequences of life in the mountains if Earth experiences liquefaction of the soil combined with earthquakes in events that are far beyond our comprehension.

Last, but not least in the risk assessment for mountainous regions is the risk from fire. Even today, under relatively normal conditions, fire is one of the greatest risks to any mountain habitat and lifestyle. Why? Because unless you have vast amounts of water and the ability to move that water, fire pretty much burns through everything until it is extinguished. It doesn’t help that wooded terrain, better known as forests; provide the perfect fuel for any fire. Statistics show that on average, fire destroys about 5% of worldwide forests annually. This may not sound like a lot unless you happen to be living within that 5% region.

It’s been predicted and prophesized that Earth could experience a period of extreme solar activity. Such events have been described in ancient scriptures as they reference a time when the Sun became so hot that people had to jump into lakes and rivers to stay cool. These scriptures also state that the waters in the rivers and lakes boiled and those people did not survive.

We already know that some cosmic event is already acting on our Sun and every planet in our solar system. The ice core sample data from the Antarctic reveals a clear pattern of hot and cold cycles of Earth while scientists have proven these temperature pattern are directly related to solar output and not the burning of fossil fuels.

Scientists have proven the Sun is going through changes today that they have never witnessed before. In October 2008, NASA scientists warned that the heliosphere, the protective shield of energy that surrounds our solar system, has weakened by 25 per cent over the past decade and is now at it lowest level since the space race began 50 years ago. This means that, since 2008, Earth is being bombarded with at least 25% more cosmic radiation from the galaxy.

What happens if a cosmic event occurs that causes our Sun to heat up or reduces Earth’s protection from solar radiation? Predictions and prophecy of the potential cosmic events indicate that Earth may very well experience a period of intense heat coming from the Sun. Some indications are that our Sun could become 20% to 30% hotter for a short period of time.

Of course this is all speculation and this information is not being provided as proof. Instead, it is being provided as a BIG “what if”. What if the Sun got 20% to 30% hotter through the coming events? What if there were no firefighters available to stop a forest fire? What if the heat was so intense that every forest caught on fire? What if you had created a mountain habitat and the forest was on fire? How would you survive if most or all of your resources were burned up in a devastating fire?

The answers to these questions are not so difficult are they? If you are living in the mountains and the forest catches on fire, you run! You run and if necessary, you leave everything behind that you can not carry. The question you must ask yourself is whether such a location provides and environment with long-term sustainability.

Now let’s summarize why mountainous regions provide the greatest risks of any location on the planet.

 

  • Mountainous regions are on the exact locations where fault lines exist and where earthquakes have occurred which created the mountains.
  • The elevation of mountainous regions produces steep slopes where water can move quickly down the hillsides and valleys.
  • Mountainous regions are generally covered with dense forests and wooded areas where they also provide the most habitable environment.
  • With the coming events, there is a potential of torrential rains that could last for weeks or even months, saturating the subsoil far beyond anything every witnessed.
  • Extreme saturation of the subsoil is the catalyst for liquefaction or the liquefying of earth so that it flows with the characteristics of water.
  • The devastating affects of liquefaction are more dramatic in mountainous areas with steep slopes that can result in unpredictable mudslides, rock slides, and flash floods.
  • Even with what we would consider nominal earthquakes, the risk of devastating liquefaction increases dramatically.
  • Research has proven that mountain ranges have risen or fallen 3,000 to 9,000 meters from cataclysmic events in Earth's recent past history.
  • With the coming events, there is a potential of earthquakes that are far beyond anything previously experienced and even beyond our comprehension.
  • With the coming events, there is a potential of extreme solar activity and a sudden increase in temperatures that could cause the grass and trees to catch on fire instantly.

Only after the extensive research to create this “Where Will It Be Safe?” document, did it become obvious that the highest risk locations are in mountainous regions.

The information contain herein is for those who may want to consider the risks of certain areas during this unusual and unpredictable time in history. Many who read this may not believe in the potential cosmic or Earth events. They may not believe that any major or cataclysmic events are coming in our near or distant future. They may not believe that our climate is going to change dramatically or that we may experience extreme solar activity and weather changes. And they may not believe in the potential for massive earthquakes beyond our comprehension.

The most important factor when making any decisions is learning how to balance our intellectual knowledge with our intuition. Basing any decision on one without the other is only utilizing part of your consciousness. By understanding the physical possibilities of these times and combining that with the spiritual possibilities of these times, anyone can make an informed decision about choosing a location. This means that it is important to gain knowledge and wisdom about Earth’s history and your inner self before making any decision. Those who make decisions without putting in this effort may explain why so few people survived the previous cataclysmic events.

 

For more information on the risks of an island (top of mountain) location, please refer to our write up on Island Locations.

Back to Top

Where Will It Be Safe?

 

Natural Resources: Access to natural resources is essential in order to create any type of sustainable environment. Natural resources include: food, water, building materials, and any other plants or raw materials you may need to create clothing and generate power.

Off-the-grid sustainability implies that you have achieved 100% self-reliance with no more trips to stores, gas stations, or medical facilities. In order to create an environment that’s sustainable for the period after the Possible Earth Events, it’s essential that it’s running efficiently prior to these events. However, if you find yourself in a position where you don’t have access to at least food and water after these events, then no preparations prior to the events will matter.

 

 

 

Sustainability and survival itself depends on access to natural resources. Some storage of resources would be prudent to accommodate for possible gaps in resource access that may occur due to abrupt changes in weather, water tables, and eco-systems; unforeseen damage from earthquakes, and possible atmospheric conditions. The amount of resources that are stored would be based on an understanding of your geographic and environmental risks, the number of people in your community, the method of food production, and even whether your storage methods are above or below ground.

 

 

An ideal location would be one where natural resources are accessible all year round and not limited to seasonal fluctuations. This will increase the chances of maintaining sustainability through events that could alter the geography, weather, and eco-system. However, the big question is whether your choice of location will still have access to natural resources after the Possible Earth Events.

 

 

Many of these events could instantly change access to natural resources. Shifts in the crust and earthquakes could change water tables, submerge rivers, and drain lakes. Volcanic fallout could smother vegetation and poison water supplies. Intense heat could cause spontaneous fires and destroy vegetation. It’s challenging, at best, to consider all possibilities, but it’s also essential in order to ensure your ability to sur-thrive through these times and these events.

Recommendation: Choose a location that has a long growing season before, but more importantly a high probability after the Possible Earth Events. Maintain adequate storage of resources for emergency and other possible issues with resource access. Choose a location that has multiple water sources and maintain the ability to dig, drill, or excavate to access underground water supplies.

Back to Top